Page 75 - Veritas - 02.03.22

Regardless of these limitations, touch DNA is still an emerging con-

cept in the forensic field. Presently, several studies and researches

are conducted, all aiming to examine the various aspects of touch

DNA and its probative value in the justice system. Such analysis

widens the scope of using touch DNA evidence for individualiza-

tion in criminal cases.

REFERENCES:

• Kasper, S.P. (2015). Latent Print Processing Guide. Retrieved from

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Latent_Print_Process-

ing_Guide/wol4CgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0

• Lowe, Murray, Whitaker, Tully, & Gill. (2002). The propensity of

individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low lev-

el DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. Forensic Science Inter-

national, 129(1), 25-34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-

0738(02)00207-4

• Martin, Kaesler, Kirkbride, & Adrian. (2022). The influences of dusty

environments on the STR typing success of post-detonation touch

DNA samples. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 57. Retrieved

from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102651

• Newman, T. (2018, January 11). What is DNA and how does it work?.

DNA explained: Structure and function. Retrieved from https://

www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/319818#what-is-dna

• Ryan, S. (2016, March 17). Touch DNA. What is it? Where is it? How

much can be found? And, how can it impact my case? [Blog post].

Retrieved from http://ryanforensicdna.com/touchdna/

• Sessa et al. (2019). Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch

deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An exper-

imental study. Scientific Reports 9, Article number: 9542. Retrieved

from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-46051-9#Sec9

• Van Oorschot et al. (2003). Are you collecting all the available DNA

from touched objects? International Congress Series 1239, 803-807.

Retrieved from https://www.isfg.org/files/31f9316afbc584bc0befd-

4454d6cd38c4f064f3a.02004983_748131740352.pdf